The soteriologies of Karl Rahner and Hans Urs von Balthasar
Karl Rahner and Hans Urs von Balthasar differed in their approaches to Christian soteriology, especially in their understandings of redemption and the cross. These differences stem in part from Rahner’s emphasis on the Trinity in history (the economic Trinity) and Balthasar’s focus on the Trinity’s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Marquette Univ. Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2016, Volume: 28, Issue: 2, Pages: 513-525 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Rahner, Karl 1904-1984
/ Balthasar, Hans Urs von 1905-1988
/ Soteriology
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NBK Soteriology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Karl Rahner and Hans Urs von Balthasar differed in their approaches to Christian soteriology, especially in their understandings of redemption and the cross. These differences stem in part from Rahner’s emphasis on the Trinity in history (the economic Trinity) and Balthasar’s focus on the Trinity’s inner life (the immanent Trinity). While Balthasar’s soteriology better reflects the Church’s official descending Christology, Rahner’s ascending Christology (with its view of Jesus as the fullness of God united to human nature) is the more profound. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0890-2461 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol20168156 |