A philosopher's response to Johnson's reasoned look at Asian religions
The author critically evaluates the book "A reasoned look at Asian religions" by David Johnson. G. Foulk shows several confusions in Johnson's rational evaluation of the Advaita Vedanta. Foulk refers only very briefly to Islam and utilitarism of the Chinese thinker Mo Ti. He praises J...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
1990
|
In: |
Asian thought & society
Year: 1990, Volume: 15, Issue: 43, Pages: 87-93 |
Further subjects: | B
Islam
B Asia B Asia Hinduism Islam Philosophy Confucianism B Hinduism B Confucianism B Philosophy |
Summary: | The author critically evaluates the book "A reasoned look at Asian religions" by David Johnson. G. Foulk shows several confusions in Johnson's rational evaluation of the Advaita Vedanta. Foulk refers only very briefly to Islam and utilitarism of the Chinese thinker Mo Ti. He praises Johnson for showing similarities between Aristotle and Confucius. (DÜI-Sen) |
---|---|
Physical Description: | Lit.Hinw. S. 92-93 |
ISSN: | 0361-3968 |
Contains: | In: Asian thought & society
|