Die Basilianische Verherrlichung des Heiligen Geistes auf dem Konzil zu Konstantinopel 381: ein Beitrag zum Ursprung der Formel "Kerygma und Dogma"

Basil, Macarius-Symeon and in particular Gregory of Nyssa make it clear that charismatic and ascetic groups of a pre-messalian type could have exercised a great deal of influence on the events of the Council. Were the ascetics praised by Gregory of Nyssa at the end of his Council speech (vulgo: In s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Staats, Reinhart 1937- (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1979
In: Kerygma und Dogma
Year: 1979, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 232-253
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Basilius, Caesariensis 330-379 / Macarius, Aegyptius 300-390 / Gregory of Nyssa 335-394 / Gregorius, Nazianzenus 329-390 / Charismatic / Ascetic / Konzil von Konstantinopel 1. (381 : Konstantinopel)
Description
Summary:Basil, Macarius-Symeon and in particular Gregory of Nyssa make it clear that charismatic and ascetic groups of a pre-messalian type could have exercised a great deal of influence on the events of the Council. Were the ascetics praised by Gregory of Nyssa at the end of his Council speech (vulgo: In suam ordinationem) and some of the participants of the Council criticized by Gregory of Nazianzus because of their readiness to theological compromise (Carmen de vita sua 1703-1796) in fact very close to each other? Was it also because of a different attitude towards charismatic and ascetic monastic theologians that the Council President, Gregory of Nazianzus, came to grief?
ISSN:0023-0707
Contains:In: Kerygma und Dogma