Engelhardt as Sectarian: An Evangelical Protestant Consideration of After God

In this article, I argue that while Christians should share Engelhardt's disappointment in how bioethics functions in the world, they should not share his exasperation. I begin by outlining the general argument in After God, its understanding of secularism, and of how such secularism has impact...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Thobaben, James R. 1954- (Autore)
Altri autori: Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 1941-2018 (Antecedente bibliografico)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Review
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2017]
In: Christian bioethics
Anno: 2017, Volume: 23, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 200-218
Recensione di:After God (Yonkers, New York : St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 2017) (Thobaben, James R.)
Notazioni IxTheo:CH Cristianesimo e società
NCH Etica della medicina
VA Filosofia
Altre parole chiave:B Recensione
Accesso online: Volltext (Publisher)
Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:In this article, I argue that while Christians should share Engelhardt's disappointment in how bioethics functions in the world, they should not share his exasperation. I begin by outlining the general argument in After God, its understanding of secularism, and of how such secularism has impacted bioethics. Next, I suggest that Englehardt appears to lean toward disengagement or at least an extremely suspicious sectarianism. Rather, I claim that it is possible for Christians to morally engage in a useful way with others and still base their own moral activity on proper life telos. Such cooperation is not to serve a commonly-held ultimate purpose, but shared proximate ends. That said, the moral discourse with those outside the Church may be necessarily limited by shallow moral acquaintanceship. I argue that the concept of "middle axioms" can be used as a mechanism for engagement with others in this society. Importantly, this approach does not require abandoning distinctive Christian commitments and foundational assumptions.
ISSN:1744-4195
Comprende:Enthalten in: Christian bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/cb/cbx005