Engelhardt as Sectarian: An Evangelical Protestant Consideration of After God

In this article, I argue that while Christians should share Engelhardt's disappointment in how bioethics functions in the world, they should not share his exasperation. I begin by outlining the general argument in After God, its understanding of secularism, and of how such secularism has impact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Thobaben, James R. 1954- (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 1941-2018 (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks)
Medienart: Elektronisch Review
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: [2017]
In: Christian bioethics
Jahr: 2017, Band: 23, Heft: 2, Seiten: 200-218
Rezension von:After God (Yonkers, New York : St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 2017) (Thobaben, James R.)
IxTheo Notationen:CH Christentum und Gesellschaft
NCH Medizinische Ethik
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Rezension
Online-Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this article, I argue that while Christians should share Engelhardt's disappointment in how bioethics functions in the world, they should not share his exasperation. I begin by outlining the general argument in After God, its understanding of secularism, and of how such secularism has impacted bioethics. Next, I suggest that Englehardt appears to lean toward disengagement or at least an extremely suspicious sectarianism. Rather, I claim that it is possible for Christians to morally engage in a useful way with others and still base their own moral activity on proper life telos. Such cooperation is not to serve a commonly-held ultimate purpose, but shared proximate ends. That said, the moral discourse with those outside the Church may be necessarily limited by shallow moral acquaintanceship. I argue that the concept of "middle axioms" can be used as a mechanism for engagement with others in this society. Importantly, this approach does not require abandoning distinctive Christian commitments and foundational assumptions.
ISSN:1744-4195
Enthält:Enthalten in: Christian bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/cb/cbx005