A Prolegomenon to Catholic Moral Teaching on Sperm Motility Treatment

Sperm motility treatment for male infertility has, as yet, drawn no specific official Catholic teaching. Moral theologians rely on previous magisterial documents like Donum Vitae and Dignitatis Personae to state what might be morally permissible or impermissible. Some reject the treatment, holding t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ayang, John M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2016]
In: Christian bioethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 22, Issue: 3, Pages: 315-324
IxTheo Classification:CF Christianity and Science
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NCA Ethics
NCF Sexual ethics
NCH Medical ethics
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Sperm motility treatment for male infertility has, as yet, drawn no specific official Catholic teaching. Moral theologians rely on previous magisterial documents like Donum Vitae and Dignitatis Personae to state what might be morally permissible or impermissible. Some reject the treatment, holding that it involves masturbation and separates the unitive and procreative ends of marriage. Experience shows that these views are truncated, devoid of nuanced applicability in concrete situations which are usually variegated. A Catholic norm based on these would be vague and pastorally deficient. Rather, a norm that takes into consideration the concrete experience of infertile couples, the social stigma of infertility, a holistic view of conjugal love, and the therapeutic value of sperm motility treatment is needed. In this essay, I present salient Catholic statements on reproductive technology and argue that sperm motility treatment is morally acceptable and imports a greater marital good.1
ISSN:1744-4195
Contains:Enthalten in: Christian bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/cb/cbw015