Pelagian or Procrustean? Weighing Hugh Rock's Reading of George Fox and James Arminius

This article responds to Hugh Rock's recent attempt to locate Quaker theology in relation to Calvinism. Rock conflates George Fox's and James Arminius' doctrines and identifies them with a latter-day Pelagianism in conflict with the Augustinianism of their Calvinist opponents. This ar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Kuiken, Jerome (Author)
Contributors: Rock, Hugh (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Liverpool University Press [2018]
In: Quaker studies
Year: 2018, Volume: 23, Issue: 2, Pages: 179-190
IxTheo Classification:KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KDD Protestant Church
KDG Free church
NBK Soteriology
Further subjects:B Pelagianism
B Augustinianism
B George Fox
B Quaker soteriology
B Hugh Rock
B James Arminius
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This article responds to Hugh Rock's recent attempt to locate Quaker theology in relation to Calvinism. Rock conflates George Fox's and James Arminius' doctrines and identifies them with a latter-day Pelagianism in conflict with the Augustinianism of their Calvinist opponents. This article corrects Rock's claims. The first part of the article clearly distinguishes Fox's doctrines from Arminius' and both Fox's (and other early Quakers') and Arminius' doctrines from Pelagianism. The second part of the article locates early Quakers' and Arminius' disagreements with Calvinism within the long tradition of debate between moderate and strict Augustinians.
ISSN:2397-1770
Reference:Kritik von "Quakerism understood in relation to Calvinism (2017)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Quaker studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.3828/quaker.2018.23.2.3