The Buddhist Ineffable Self and a Possible Indian Political Subject

It is well known that the sovereign, the cakkavatin, in India is the one who turns the wheel of dhamma. What is not so well appreciated is that the Buddha's dhammachakkapabbatana, the turning of the wheel of dhamma and the attainment of nibbana, can be read as a political act, involving the eme...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Autres titres:Political Theology in India
Auteur principal: Giri, Saroj (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2018]
Dans: Political theology
Année: 2018, Volume: 19, Numéro: 8, Pages: 734-750
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Vasubandhu, Viṃśatiká / Buddhisme / Dharma (hindouisme) / Soi / Inde / Théologie politique
Classifications IxTheo:AD Sociologie des religions
BL Bouddhisme
KBM Asie
TB Antiquité
TK Époque contemporaine
Sujets non-standardisés:B Vasubandhu
B dhamma Nagarjuna
B Buddhism
B Ambedkar
B Political Theology
B political subjectivity
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:It is well known that the sovereign, the cakkavatin, in India is the one who turns the wheel of dhamma. What is not so well appreciated is that the Buddha's dhammachakkapabbatana, the turning of the wheel of dhamma and the attainment of nibbana, can be read as a political act, involving the emergence of a political subject. It will be seen that the 4th Century AD Buddhist philosopher Vasubandhu's vijnanavadin notion of the Ineffable Self (anavilapya atman) helps us unravel the epistemological underpinnings of the political subject in consonance with the revolutionary act of turning the wheel of dhamma. Seen in this light, we can better appreciate B. R. Ambedkar's attempt at treating Buddhism as the “Revolution” against the Brahminical “Counter-Revolution,” something whose implications unfold almost daily in India's political struggles. What can be called (in academic-speak) Buddha's “pluralist non-essentialist framework,” even a convergence of sorts between Buddha and Spinoza, does not necessarily exclude the notion of a revolutionary political subject. This opens up the possibility of reading Buddha's notion of the turning of the wheel of dhamma alongside more recent ideas of revolution as another turning and churning.
Description:Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 19 Numbers 7-8 November-December 2018"
ISSN:1743-1719
Contient:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2018.1537583