1832-1835, moment mennaisien: L'esprit croyant des années 1830
Rome's condemnation of Lamennais' ideas has been most often studied for its political significance, with the emphasis placed on the encyclical Mirari vos (1832). The second encyclical, Singulari nos (1834), has remained above all the key document for explaining the "Mennaisian drama.&...
| Published in: | Revue de l'histoire des religions |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Colin
[2018]
|
| In: |
Revue de l'histoire des religions
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Lamennais, Félicité Robert de 1782-1854
/ Condemnation
/ Catholic church, Pope (1831-1846 : Gregor XVI.), Verfasserschaft1, Mirari vos
/ Catholic church, Pope (1831-1846 : Gregor XVI.), Verfasserschaft1, Singulari nos
/ History of ideas 1832-1835
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KDB Roman Catholic Church SB Catholic Church law |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Rome's condemnation of Lamennais' ideas has been most often studied for its political significance, with the emphasis placed on the encyclical Mirari vos (1832). The second encyclical, Singulari nos (1834), has remained above all the key document for explaining the "Mennaisian drama." This paper proposes a double shift in the analysis : from the condemnation of Lamennais' political ideas (1832) to that of his philosophy (1834); from the Mennaisian drama to the dismay of a generation that had been directly or indirectly influenced by his thought. This Mennaisian moment cannot be reduced to the spectacular reversal of the famous Catholic apologist, but characterizes a singular religious configuration, inherent in the nineteenth-century believers' readings that frequently marked post-revolutionary periods. La condamnation par Rome des idées de Lamennais a le plus souvent été étudiée pour sa portée politique et l'accent a été mis sur l'encyclique Mirari vos (1832). La seconde encyclique, Singulari nos (1834), est restée surtout le motif pour expliquer le "drame mennaisien". La présente contribution propose un double déplacement d'analyse : de la condamnation des idées politiques de Lamennais (1832) à celle de sa philosophie (1834) ; du drame mennaisien au désarroi d'une génération qui en avait subi directement ou indirectement l'influence. Ce moment mennaisien ne saurait donc être réduit au spectaculaire retournement du célèbre apologiste catholique, mais caractérise une configuration religieuse singulière, inscrite dans les scansions croyantes du xixe siècle qui marquèrent souvent les périodes post-révolutionnaires. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2105-2573 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Revue de l'histoire des religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.4000/rhr.8943 |