The Seducer and the Rapist
The rule of Exod 22:15-16 refers unequivocally to an act of seduction and its legal ramifications. Its cognate rule in Deut 22:28-29 is regularly interpreted as referring to an act of rape and its legal ramifications. 11Q19 (11QTa) LXVI:8-11, however, integrates the two biblical decrees, applying th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2015]
|
| In: |
Journal of ancient Judaism
Year: 2015, Volume: 6, Issue: 2, Pages: 232-252 |
| IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism HB Old Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | The rule of Exod 22:15-16 refers unequivocally to an act of seduction and its legal ramifications. Its cognate rule in Deut 22:28-29 is regularly interpreted as referring to an act of rape and its legal ramifications. 11Q19 (11QTa) LXVI:8-11, however, integrates the two biblical decrees, applying the legal implications from Deuteronomy to the seducer. This paper examines the terms in the deuteronomic decree, demonstrating that they do not absolutely indicate violent rape; this, in turn, explains the Temple Scroll's treatment of the text as referring to an act of seduction. A variety of practical differences result from the two disparate interpretations. Finally, the paper examines the conceptual distinctions between modern criminal law and ancient Israelite divine law. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-7954 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of ancient Judaism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/jaju.2015.6.2.232 |