Disjunction in Paul: Apocalyptic or Christomorphic? Comparing the Apocalypse of Weeks with Galatians
This article compares the Apocalypse of Weeks with Galatians to examine whether the motif of creatio e contrario is apocalyptic. While reviewing the themes of revelation, salvation and eschatology in each text, it argues that creatio e contrario is absent from and theologically foreign to the Apocal...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
[2018]
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Anno: 2018, Volume: 64, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 64-80 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Bibel. Galaterbrief
/ Zehnwochenapokalypse
/ Creazione
/ Opposto
/ Disgiunzione logica (Logica)
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | HC Nuovo Testamento HD Medio-giudaismo NBC Dio NBD Creazione |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Apocalyptic
B Galatians B disjunction B Apocalypse of Weeks B creatio e contrario B Enoch B Paul |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Riepilogo: | This article compares the Apocalypse of Weeks with Galatians to examine whether the motif of creatio e contrario is apocalyptic. While reviewing the themes of revelation, salvation and eschatology in each text, it argues that creatio e contrario is absent from and theologically foreign to the Apocalypse; by contrast, this motif permeates Galatians, not because Paul retrieves it from the apocalypses but because for him the divine economy is shaped by the disjunctive, e contrario history of the crucified and risen Christ. Thus, creatio e contrario should be classified not as apocalyptic but as christomorphic. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688517000170 |
