How the Body of Lazarus Helps to Solve a Pauline Problem
While the locus classicus for early Christian arguments concerning resurrection of the flesh is Paul's first Corinthian letter, the statement in 15.50 that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God' complicates early Christian understandings of resurrection and its form. Such expl...
Published in: | New Testament studies |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2017]
|
In: |
New Testament studies
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Corinthians 1. 15,50
/ Auferweckung des Lazarus
/ Irenaeus, Lugdunensis 140-202
/ Tertullianus, Quintus Septimius Florens 150-230
/ Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430
/ Resurrection
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBE Anthropology NBQ Eschatology |
Further subjects: | B
Lazarus
B Resurrection B Gospel of John B 1 Corinthians B History of Reception B Paul |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | While the locus classicus for early Christian arguments concerning resurrection of the flesh is Paul's first Corinthian letter, the statement in 15.50 that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God' complicates early Christian understandings of resurrection and its form. Such explicit denial of fleshly inheritance and resurrection within Paul's writings leads to widely conflicting interpretations of this Corinthian passage. Consequently, early Christian writers such as Irenaeus, Tertullian and Augustine engaged other New Testament texts such as John 11 in order to subvert the claim of 1 Cor 15.50 and develop their argument for fleshly resurrection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-8145 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688517000169 |