How the Body of Lazarus Helps to Solve a Pauline Problem

While the locus classicus for early Christian arguments concerning resurrection of the flesh is Paul's first Corinthian letter, the statement in 15.50 that ‘flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God' complicates early Christian understandings of resurrection and its form. Such expl...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:New Testament studies
Main Author: Strawbridge, Jennifer R. 1978- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2017]
In: New Testament studies
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible. Corinthians 1. 15,50 / Auferweckung des Lazarus / Irenaeus, Lugdunensis 140-202 / Tertullianus, Quintus Septimius Florens 150-230 / Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430 / Resurrection
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
NBE Anthropology
NBQ Eschatology
Further subjects:B Lazarus
B Resurrection
B Gospel of John
B 1 Corinthians
B History of Reception
B Paul
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:While the locus classicus for early Christian arguments concerning resurrection of the flesh is Paul's first Corinthian letter, the statement in 15.50 that ‘flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God' complicates early Christian understandings of resurrection and its form. Such explicit denial of fleshly inheritance and resurrection within Paul's writings leads to widely conflicting interpretations of this Corinthian passage. Consequently, early Christian writers such as Irenaeus, Tertullian and Augustine engaged other New Testament texts such as John 11 in order to subvert the claim of 1 Cor 15.50 and develop their argument for fleshly resurrection.
ISSN:1469-8145
Contains:Enthalten in: New Testament studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0028688517000169