Graciously commanded: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth on the Decalogue
This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
В: |
Scottish journal of theology
Год: 2018, Том: 71, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 127-141 |
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945
/ Dekalog
/ Закон (мотив) (Богословие (мотив))
|
Индексация IxTheo: | HB Ветхий Завет KAJ Новейшее время KDD Евангелическая церковь NBE Антропология NCA Этика |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Karl Barth
B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B commandment B Decalogue B Law And Gospel |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Итог: | This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to a Christian ethics of divine command, and frame their understandings in decisively christological terms, they differ markedly on the extent to which the commandments themselves can and ought to be understood as representing concrete divine commands. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000030 |