Essence and fullness: Evaluating the creator-creature distinction in Jonathan Edwards

Soteriological participation in God, variously termed theosis, divinisation or deification commands widespread interest across the spectrum of Christian theology. A key difficulty is how to maintain the creator-creature distinction, while bridging it to gain intimacy. Jonathan Edwards provides a Ref...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salladin, James (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2017]
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 70, Issue: 4, Pages: 427-444
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Edwards, Jonathan 1703-1758 / Deification / Trinity / Participation / Communio
IxTheo Classification:KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KDD Protestant Church
NBC Doctrine of God
NBK Soteriology
Further subjects:B Participation
B Jonathan Edwards
B Divine Essence
B methexis
B Theosis
B Koinonia
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Soteriological participation in God, variously termed theosis, divinisation or deification commands widespread interest across the spectrum of Christian theology. A key difficulty is how to maintain the creator-creature distinction, while bridging it to gain intimacy. Jonathan Edwards provides a Reformed perspective on this conversation, by way of his distinction between the incommunicable divine essence and the communicable divine fullness. This article clarifies this distinction by evaluating its coherence and exploring whether it divorces God's immanent and economic life. It argues that distinguishing two forms of participation - methexis verses koinonia - clarifies coherence and shows that it does not divide God's being from act.
ISSN:1475-3065
Contains:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930617000382