How I think Hauerwas thinks about theology
This paper highlights two aspects of Stanley Hauerwas's thought: philosophical ethics, which consists of second-order methodological claims; and moral theology, which consists of first-order, local, unsystematic moral descriptions. I show how the philosophical ethics relates to the moral theolo...
| Опубликовано в: : | Scottish journal of theology |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2016]
|
| В: |
Scottish journal of theology
|
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Hauerwas, Stanley 1940-
/ Этика (мотив)
/ Философия (мотив)
/ Богословская этика
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | KDD Евангелическая церковь NCA Этика VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Liberal Protestantism
B Theology B Ethics B Stanley Hauerwas B Virtue B Wittgenstein |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | This paper highlights two aspects of Stanley Hauerwas's thought: philosophical ethics, which consists of second-order methodological claims; and moral theology, which consists of first-order, local, unsystematic moral descriptions. I show how the philosophical ethics relates to the moral theology by proposing a set of rules that constitute a grammar' of Hauerwas's thought. These rules are asymmetrical in that later rules presuppose earlier rules but earlier rules do not presuppose later rules. Each rule corresponds to texts that Hauerwas recommends and relies upon. The first rule prioritizes MacIntyre's concept of non-foundational practical wisdom'. The second rule, which draws on Aristotle, Wittgenstein, Anscombe and Kovesi to stress the impossibility of separating agent from act, influences the third rule that ethics is moral description. The fourth rule uses postliberal' theologians and draws on the liturgy alongside Barth and Yoder, in order to redescribe the shape of Christian life in liberal modernity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Connecting (2016)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930615000757 |