Revisiting Karl Barth's doctrine of baptism from a perspective on prayer
This article focuses on Karl Barth's mature doctrine of baptism, as it is developed in the final part-volume of the Church Dogmatics. Published in 1967 (English translation in 1969) as a fragment of the ethics of the doctrine of reconciliation, Barth's theology of baptism is not without it...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 68, Issue: 3, Pages: 255-272 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Baptism
/ Prayer
/ God
/ Human being
/ Participation
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CB Christian life; spirituality KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDD Protestant Church NBC Doctrine of God NBE Anthropology NBP Sacramentology; sacraments |
| Further subjects: | B
Baptism
B Agency B Karl Barth B Invocation B Correspondence B Prayer |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article focuses on Karl Barth's mature doctrine of baptism, as it is developed in the final part-volume of the Church Dogmatics. Published in 1967 (English translation in 1969) as a fragment of the ethics of the doctrine of reconciliation, Barth's theology of baptism is not without its controversy. Among the critiques that the baptism fragment has generated, one of the most significant concerns is over its presentation of the relation between divine agency and human agency. The formal division in the baptism fragment (and its sharp distinction between Spirit baptism' and water baptism') is taken to imply an uncharacteristic separation of divine agency and human agency, which renders his doctrine of baptism inconsistent with other areas of his thought. The argument proposed in this article, however, is that better clarity as to what Barth is theologically up to in the baptism fragment can be gained by reading his mature theology of baptism in connection with his theology of prayer. Barth's theology of prayer is rich and extensive. Although very present across all of his writings, his thinking on prayer (and indeed the Church Dogmatics itself) culminates in an intriguing set of meditations on the petitions of the Lord's Prayer. Although unfinished, these lectures on prayer were published posthumously as The Christian Life in 1976 (English translation 1981). Together with his doctrine of baptism and his unwritten doctrine of the Lord's Supper, the finished lectures on prayer would have formed the ethics of reconciliation. Importantly, Barth insists that baptism and the Lord's Supper were to be understood not only in the context of prayer but actually as prayer, as invocation'. Rooted in the motif of correspondence', which is deployed at a number of key points throughout the Church Dogmatics, Barth's theology of invocation is based on a highly participative account of the divine-human relation: divine agency and human agency correspond' in the crucible of prayer. From the perspective provided by his writings on prayer, invocation and the motif of the correspondence' of divine and human agency, this article revisits the critique that Barth unduly separates divine and human agency in the baptism fragment. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930615000101 |