“On Such Texts Comment is Unnecessary”: Biblical Interpretation in the Trial of Denmark Vesey

On July 2, 1822, Denmark Vesey was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina for allegedly plotting an insurrection involving enslaved persons. During his trial, several witnesses testified about Vesey’s interpretations of biblical texts. When sentencing Vesey to death, Lionel H. Kennedy accused Vesey of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schipper, Jeremy 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2017]
In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 85, Issue: 4, Pages: 1032-1049
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Vesey, Denmark 1767-1822 / Bible / Interpretation of / Kennedy, Lionel Henry 1787-1847 / Charleston, SC / Slave revolt / Geschichte 1822
IxTheo Classification:CG Christianity and Politics
KBQ North America
TJ Modern history
ZC Politics in general
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:On July 2, 1822, Denmark Vesey was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina for allegedly plotting an insurrection involving enslaved persons. During his trial, several witnesses testified about Vesey’s interpretations of biblical texts. When sentencing Vesey to death, Lionel H. Kennedy accused Vesey of “attempting to pervert the sacred words of God into a sanction for crimes of the blackest hue.” As many scholars have noted, Vesey and Kennedy choose different texts to cite in support of their respective positions. Yet this article argues that Vesey and Kennedy’s uses of biblical material go deeper than simply countering one set of proof texts with another. They differ on how to apply biblical texts to then current events in Charleston. Ultimately, this difference informs their selection of biblical texts and the strategies they use to interpret them.
ISSN:1477-4585
Contains:Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfw094