Re-examining Tertullian and Augustine's Relationship for the Theology Science Dialogue
When the development of the relationship between Theology and Science is discussed, Tertullian and Augustine are typically used to represent diametrically opposed methodologies. One such recent example is Lindberg's well-argued review of how scientific knowledge was addressed in the patristic p...
| Published in: | Science & Christian belief |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Paternoster Press
[2015]
|
| In: |
Science & Christian belief
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science HB Old Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBE Anthropology |
| Further subjects: | B
Augustine
B Soul music B Newton B NEWTON, Isaac, 1642-1727 B Tertullian, ca. 160-ca. 230 B RELIGION & science B Tertullian B divine agency B AUGUSTINE, Saint, Bishop of Hippo, 354-430 |
| Summary: | When the development of the relationship between Theology and Science is discussed, Tertullian and Augustine are typically used to represent diametrically opposed methodologies. One such recent example is Lindberg's well-argued review of how scientific knowledge was addressed in the patristic period, which contrasts viewing science with suspicion (Tertullian) with the approach which sees it as a servant to theology (Augustine). This paper explores a largely unnoticed and unexamined dependency of Augustine in de Genesi ad Litteram on Tertullian's de Anima. Augustine's argument closely follows that of Tertullian, departing from the text of Genesis at the same places for the same topics as Tertullian. Noteworthy is that Augustine follows Tertullian at one point where Tertullian reverses his normal rhetoric to base his understanding of anthropology and in particular of the origin and nature of the soul upon contemporary scientia rather than his usual practice of beginning with Scripture. Rather than Tertullian and Augustine being exemplars of different approaches to the relationship of theology and science this examination of the close dependence of one theologian on the other and on then contemporary best scientific knowledge further demonstrates that the relationship is far more complicated and interdependent than often acknowledged. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Science & Christian belief
|