Exploring Single and Multiple Religious Belonging

This contribution studies the notion of single and multiple religious belonging in a sample of 265 Dutch respondents. We will first focus on modalities of religious belonging and subsequently compare those who claim to draw from just one religion (the monoreligious) with those who indicate that they...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Berghuijs, Joantine 1955- (Author) ; Schilderman, Hans 1959- (Author) ; van der Braak, André (Author)
Contributors: Kalsky, Manuela 1961- (Other)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: Journal of empirical theology
Year: 2018, Volume: 31, Issue: 1, Pages: 18-48
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religion / Affiliation with / Religious pluralism / Religious commitment / Flexibility / Loyalty
IxTheo Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AE Psychology of religion
AX Inter-religious relations
CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations
Further subjects:B religious belonging multiple religious belonging religious commitment religious flexibility openness loyalty motivation
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:This contribution studies the notion of single and multiple religious belonging in a sample of 265 Dutch respondents. We will first focus on modalities of religious belonging and subsequently compare those who claim to draw from just one religion (the monoreligious) with those who indicate that they combine elements from different religious traditions (the multireligious) in terms of their intensities and styles of belonging, loyalty and mobility, and motivations for belonging. In general, multireligious respondents are characterized by their larger flexibility in religious matters as they tend to focus on similarities and common elements in different religions, and less on boundaries between them. By being loyal to themselves in the first place, they feel free to adopt and to leave behind religious beliefs and communities. Emotional and institutional bonds for each religion appear to be less strong than for monoreligious individuals in relation to their single religion.
ISSN:1570-9256
Contains:In: Journal of empirical theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15709256-12341365