Yes and No: A Critical Response to F. Gerald Downing
This essay replies to F. Gerald Downing's critical response to my article The Narratives of the Gospels and the Historical Jesus: Current Debates, Prior Debates and the Goal of Historical Jesus Research' (Keith 2016). I focus on four matters: authenticity', memory theory', tr...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Anno: 2017, Volume: 40, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 62-72 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Bibel. Evangelien
/ Jesus Christus
/ Storicità
/ Autenticità
/ Memoria collettiva
/ Tradizione
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | HC Nuovo Testamento |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
F. Gerald Downing
B Narratives B Misrepresentation B Apocryphal Gospels B Religious Aspects B Historical Jesus B social memory theory B DOWNING, F. Gerald B Jesus Christ B Collective Memory |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Riepilogo: | This essay replies to F. Gerald Downing's critical response to my article The Narratives of the Gospels and the Historical Jesus: Current Debates, Prior Debates and the Goal of Historical Jesus Research' (Keith 2016). I focus on four matters: authenticity', memory theory', tradition' and the concept of going behind' the text. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Riferimento: | Kritik von "Feasible Researches in Historical Jesus Tradition (2017)"
|
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X17723487 |
