Yes and No: A Critical Response to F. Gerald Downing
This essay replies to F. Gerald Downing's critical response to my article The Narratives of the Gospels and the Historical Jesus: Current Debates, Prior Debates and the Goal of Historical Jesus Research' (Keith 2016). I focus on four matters: authenticity', memory theory', tr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2017, Volume: 40, Issue: 1, Pages: 62-72 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Gospels
/ Jesus Christus
/ Historicity
/ Authenticity
/ Collective memory
/ Tradition
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
F. Gerald Downing
B Narratives B Misrepresentation B Apocryphal Gospels B Religious Aspects B Historical Jesus B social memory theory B DOWNING, F. Gerald B Jesus Christ B Collective Memory |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This essay replies to F. Gerald Downing's critical response to my article The Narratives of the Gospels and the Historical Jesus: Current Debates, Prior Debates and the Goal of Historical Jesus Research' (Keith 2016). I focus on four matters: authenticity', memory theory', tradition' and the concept of going behind' the text. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Feasible Researches in Historical Jesus Tradition (2017)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X17723487 |
