Yes and No: A Critical Response to F. Gerald Downing
This essay replies to F. Gerald Downing's critical response to my article The Narratives of the Gospels and the Historical Jesus: Current Debates, Prior Debates and the Goal of Historical Jesus Research' (Keith 2016). I focus on four matters: authenticity', memory theory', tr...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2017]
|
| En: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Año: 2017, Volumen: 40, Número: 1, Páginas: 62-72 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Bibel. Evangelien
/ Jesus Christus
/ Historicidad
/ Autenticidad
/ Memoria colectiva
/ Tradición
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | HC Nuevo Testamento |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
F. Gerald Downing
B Narratives B Misrepresentation B Apocryphal Gospels B Religious Aspects B Historical Jesus B social memory theory B DOWNING, F. Gerald B Jesus Christ B Collective Memory |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | This essay replies to F. Gerald Downing's critical response to my article The Narratives of the Gospels and the Historical Jesus: Current Debates, Prior Debates and the Goal of Historical Jesus Research' (Keith 2016). I focus on four matters: authenticity', memory theory', tradition' and the concept of going behind' the text. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5294 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Feasible Researches in Historical Jesus Tradition (2017)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the New Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0142064X17723487 |
