The Theocentric Perspective of Laudato Si’: A Critical Discussion
In this article, I focus on Pope Francis’s “green” encyclical, Laudato Si’. After outlining some of its characteristics, I single out the pope’s engagement with anthropocentrism for critical discussion. The pope criticizes anthropocentrism (the view that human beings alone have intrinsic value), see...
| Publié dans: | Philosophia reformata |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2018
|
| Dans: |
Philosophia reformata
Année: 2018, Volume: 83, Numéro: 1, Pages: 51-67 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAJ Époque contemporaine KDB Église catholique romaine NBC Dieu NBD Création NBE Anthropologie NCG Éthique de la création; Éthique environnementale |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Anthropocentrism
common creation story
ecological crisis
environmental ethics
Pope Francis
Laudato Si’
technology
theocentrism
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | In this article, I focus on Pope Francis’s “green” encyclical, Laudato Si’. After outlining some of its characteristics, I single out the pope’s engagement with anthropocentrism for critical discussion. The pope criticizes anthropocentrism (the view that human beings alone have intrinsic value), seeing it as a root cause of ecological destruction. Instead, he proposes what I would call a theocentric conception of nature. I criticize this view. First, I suggest that the pope is insufficiently critical in adopting a theocentric approach to the common creation story. Secondly, I argue from both a biblical-theological and a philosophical perspective against the pope’s resistance to the anthropocentrism of Genesis 1:26. Thirdly, I argue that because the pope opts for non-anthropocentrism, the encyclical falls short of offering a constructive way forward in relation to functioning in a technocratic society. Through these comments, I seek to strengthen the powerful and important message of this encyclical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
| Contient: | In: Philosophia reformata
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/23528230-08301004 |