Moral Paralysis and Practical Denial: Environmental Ethics in Light of Human Failure
In environmental ethics, there has been too little attention to the question of why changes in environmental beliefs do not simply result in changes in behavior, given that this gap between belief and behavior is widespread. In this essay, I argue that two forms of inaction that exhibit this gap can...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
[2017]
|
In: |
Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 37, Issue: 2, Pages: 171-187 |
IxTheo Classification: | KDD Protestant Church NBE Anthropology NBM Doctrine of Justification NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | In environmental ethics, there has been too little attention to the question of why changes in environmental beliefs do not simply result in changes in behavior, given that this gap between belief and behavior is widespread. In this essay, I argue that two forms of inaction that exhibit this gap can be helpfully analyzed by reading them in terms of a Lutheran account of sin. To make the argument, I distinguish seven forms of and reasons for inaction, from which I pull out two "privileged" forms of inaction that characterize people who could act and yet do not. Using psychological and sociological research, I interpret these two forms of inaction as, on the one hand, people's attempts at securing righteousness and, on the other hand, people's terrorized consciences in response to the complexity and gravity of climate change. I end suggesting a turn to justification within Christian environmental ethics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2326-2176 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Society of Christian Ethics, Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/sce.2017.0039 |