A Survey and Analysis of Recent "Canonical" Methods (2000-2015)
By surveying proposals on canonical interpretation submitted in the last 15 years, we can trace a gradual rift between the proposals that theologians submit and the proposals that biblical scholars submit. In particular, we will identify an old but largely unrecognized distinction between hypermater...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2016
|
In: |
Journal of theological interpretation
Year: 2016, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 145-155 |
IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history |
Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Sacred Texts B Intertextuality B Communities B Bible B Biblical Theology B Old Testament B Biblical Hermeneutics B Torah B Literature report 2000-2015 B Religious Literature |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | By surveying proposals on canonical interpretation submitted in the last 15 years, we can trace a gradual rift between the proposals that theologians submit and the proposals that biblical scholars submit. In particular, we will identify an old but largely unrecognized distinction between hypermaterial and nonmaterial forms of canonical reading. The hypermaterial readingoften adopted by biblical scholarsfuses how the canon functions with how the canon was formed. The second type of reading, a nonmaterial reading, focuses on canonical unity and tends to be a position held by theologians. These proponents do not completely abandon the physical features of canon but claim that the unity of the canon comes from the outsidethrough the lens of theological (and a theocentric) cohesion. Given these two extremes, either a third option or a bridge that closes the gap is necessary. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2576-7933 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of theological interpretation
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/26373992 |