Endrede grenseflater i en norsk religionsmodell?
In this article I analyse three types of borders in the Norwegian model of religion, as they are expressed in two areas: in the area of constitution and other basic legislation, and in the area of public health care and hospitals. These three types are: 1) the border between the state and the majori...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Norwegian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Univ.
[2015]
|
| In: |
Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Year: 2015, Volume: 62, Pages: 171-188 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Norway
/ Religion
/ Demarcation
/ Denomination (Religion)
|
| Further subjects: | B
State and religion
B constitution and religion B Norwegian model of religion B religion in hospitals |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In this article I analyse three types of borders in the Norwegian model of religion, as they are expressed in two areas: in the area of constitution and other basic legislation, and in the area of public health care and hospitals. These three types are: 1) the border between the state and the majority church with respect to which I particularly focus on the implications of the recent changes to the Norwegian constitution; 2) between the state and religious and worldview communities; 3) and between the majority church and religious communities. A main conclusion is that these borders follow different patterns and trajectories in the two areas of legislation and health care. In the final section, I discuss this conclusion in the light of Linda Woodhead's recent contributions to a theory of public religion. Denne artikkelen analyserer tre grenseflater i en norsk religionsmodell, slik disse viser seg på to områder, nemlig i Grunnloven og annen sentral lovgivning, og innen helsesektoren og offentlige sykehus. Disse tre er grense¬flatene mellom staten og majoritetskirken, med særlig vekt på betydningen av grunn¬lovsendringene fra 2012, mellom staten og tros- og livssynssamfunnene, og mellom majoritetskirken og tros- og livssynssamfunnene. En sentral konklusjon er at disse grenseflatene ikke følger de samme linjene når vi sammenligner Grunnloven og annen lovgivning med helsesektor og sykehus, men snarere viser forskjellige mønstre. I et avsluttende avsnitt diskuteres denne konklusjonen nærmere i lys av Linda Woodheads bidrag til teori om offentlig religion |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1904-8181 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.7146/rt.v0i62.22576 |