New Testament Christology, Athanasian Apologetic, and Pagan Polemic

In the absence of full-scale credal formulae, New Testament authors wrote of Christ the god-man utilizing language applied to God in the Old Testament. In the effort to emphasize the divinity and uniqueness of Christ, the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews utilized three terms: katharos (10:22), d...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Greenwood, David Neal 1970- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2018]
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2018, Volume: 69, Issue: 1, Pages: 101-105
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hebrews / Christology / Athanasius Alexandrinus 295-373 / Incarnation of Jesus Christ / Julian, Römisches Reich, Kaiser 331-363 / Herakles
IxTheo Classification:BE Greco-Roman religions
CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations
HC New Testament
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
NBF Christology
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:In the absence of full-scale credal formulae, New Testament authors wrote of Christ the god-man utilizing language applied to God in the Old Testament. In the effort to emphasize the divinity and uniqueness of Christ, the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews utilized three terms: katharos (10:22), dēmiurgos (11:10), and dynatos (11:19), all part of an extended passage treating God's sacrifice and man's resulting salvation. This theme and language crops up again in Athanasius of Alexandria, employed to defend and explain the incarnation of Christ, and then once more in Julian the Apostate, employed to appropriate characteristics of Christ for his pagan Christ-parallel of Heracles.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/flx231