Making "Science" from "Superstition": Conceptions of Knowledge Legitimacy among Contemporary Yijing Diviners

Yijing prediction is experiencing a popular revival in the contemporary PRC, ongoing since the beginning of the Reform era. At the same time, state and popular discourse continue to valorize "science" (kexue 科學) as modern, accurate, and legitimate, against backward, false, and illegitimate...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Chinese religions
Main Author: Matthews, William (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Johns Hopkins University Press [2017]
In: Journal of Chinese religions
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B China / Yi jing (Work) / Revival / Fortune-telling / Superstition / Science
Further subjects:B PRC
B Yijing
B Divination
B Superstition
B Epistemology
B Science
B Cosmology
B Legitimacy
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:Yijing prediction is experiencing a popular revival in the contemporary PRC, ongoing since the beginning of the Reform era. At the same time, state and popular discourse continue to valorize "science" (kexue 科學) as modern, accurate, and legitimate, against backward, false, and illegitimate "superstition" (mixin 迷信). Yijing prediction is widely considered "superstitious," but is cast by diviners as a legitimate form of knowledge. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in Hangzhou 杭州, this article identifies six common popular attitudes to "science" in relation to other knowledge systems, and examines them through case studies of two predictors. Predictors maintain a strong epistemological and ethical concern with accurately accounting for reality, identifying Yijing prediction positively as "scientific" or as compatible with "science," against other forms of knowledge like religion and Marxism, which are considered "superstitious" and inaccurate. Predictors thus appropriate and redefine the prevailing discourse of knowledge legitimacy based on their individual epistemological perspectives.
ISSN:2050-8999
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of Chinese religions
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/0737769X.2017.1345193