The mystery of atonement and Swinburne's reparation theory
Traditional Christianity holds that Jesus Christ somehow helps to bring about our salvation. A theory of atonement' is a theory about how he does this. One influential and elegant theory of atonement is Richard Swinburne's reparation theory. In this article, I contend that this theory fai...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2017]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 53, Issue: 1, Pages: 133-141 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Swinburne, Richard 1934-
/ Forgiveness of sins
/ Jesus Christus
/ Mediator
/ Redemption
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBF Christology NBK Soteriology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Traditional Christianity holds that Jesus Christ somehow helps to bring about our salvation. A theory of atonement' is a theory about how he does this. One influential and elegant theory of atonement is Richard Swinburne's reparation theory. In this article, I contend that this theory fails to satisfy an important condition of adequacy on theories of atonement that has been overlooked in the literature. I first argue that in order to be plausible, a theory of atonement must not imply that failure to believe in the correct theory of atonement greatly hinders one from being benefited by Christ's salvific work. I then argue that reparation theory does have this problematic implication. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412515000566 |