Schellenberg's evolutionary religion: how evolutionary and how religious?

In Evolutionary Religion, J. L. Schellenberg synthesizes his previous impressive contributions to an understanding of religion by formulating an account of religion supported by a Darwinian evolutionary theory understood as a science of the deep future. Such a future enables the realization that our...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Rottschaefer, William A. 1933- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2016]
In: Religious studies
Anno: 2016, Volume: 52, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 475-496
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Schellenberg, J. L. 1959- / Evoluzione / Religione / Schellenberg, J. L. 1959-, Evolutionary religion
Notazioni IxTheo:AB Filosofia delle religioni
VB Ermeneutica; Filosofia
Accesso online: Volltext (Publisher)
Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:In Evolutionary Religion, J. L. Schellenberg synthesizes his previous impressive contributions to an understanding of religion by formulating an account of religion supported by a Darwinian evolutionary theory understood as a science of the deep future. Such a future enables the realization that our present understandings of religion are immature, that future understandings of divine reality may be radically altered and that religious practice may become the centre of human well-being. In this article, I argue that Schellenberg's evolutionary religion represents at best but half the evolutionary story, its epistemic side. Ontologically, it remains fundamentally non-evolutionary. Positively, I suggest naturalistic alternatives to Schellenberg's Ultimate. I conclude that Schellenberg's evolutionary religion is neither adequately evolutionary nor adequately religious.
ISSN:1469-901X
Comprende:Enthalten in: Religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0034412516000111