Physiologies of eros: a response to Fiona Ellis
In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| 出版: |
[2016]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2016, 卷: 52, 發布: 2, Pages: 263-272 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
/ Eros (概念)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | VA Philosophy |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological states that condition our desire. I argue that such a move allows us to see how questions about eroticism and questions about nihilism are in fact integrally connected. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412515000153 |