Physiologies of eros: a response to Fiona Ellis
In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
[2016]
|
| Em: |
Religious studies
Ano: 2016, Volume: 52, Número: 2, Páginas: 263-272 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
/ Eros (Termo)
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | VA Filosofia |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological states that condition our desire. I argue that such a move allows us to see how questions about eroticism and questions about nihilism are in fact integrally connected. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412515000153 |