Two erotic ideals
In his article Nietzsche, Tristan, and the rehabilitation of erotic distance' Joseph D. Kuzma identifies two seemingly opposed erotic ideals in Wagner's Tristan and Isolde. He claims that Nietzsche applauded the first and sought to dispense with the second, and that this was his solution...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
| En: |
Religious studies
Año: 2015, Volumen: 51, Número: 1, Páginas: 41-59 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
/ Wagner, Richard 1813-1883, Tristan und Isolde
/ Eros (Término)
/ Ideal
/ Schopenhauer, Arthur 1788-1860
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | VA Filosofía |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | In his article Nietzsche, Tristan, and the rehabilitation of erotic distance' Joseph D. Kuzma identifies two seemingly opposed erotic ideals in Wagner's Tristan and Isolde. He claims that Nietzsche applauded the first and sought to dispense with the second, and that this was his solution to the problem of nihilism. I argue that this solution' is as ill-defined as the ideals it involves, and that it either consigns us to hell or offers a terminological variant upon theism. I rescue Schopenhauer from some familiar charges and make a link with Simone Weil's reflections upon love's impossibility. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412514000183 |