The Open Future Square of Opposition: a Defense
This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bival...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Опубликовано: |
[2017]
|
В: |
Sophia
Год: 2017, Том: 56, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 573-587 |
Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии NBC Бог VA Философия |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Molinism
B Open Theism B Gregory Boyd B Open future B William Lane Craig |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
Итог: | This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bivalence and a classical conception of omniscience. In what follows, I argue that it can. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-016-0558-5 |