The Open Future Square of Opposition: a Defense
This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bival...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Sophia
Anno: 2017, Volume: 56, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 573-587 |
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AB Filosofia delle religioni NBC Dio VA Filosofia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Molinism
B Open Theism B Gregory Boyd B Open future B William Lane Craig |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bivalence and a classical conception of omniscience. In what follows, I argue that it can. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-016-0558-5 |
