The Open Future Square of Opposition: a Defense
This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bival...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado: |
[2017]
|
En: |
Sophia
Año: 2017, Volumen: 56, Número: 4, Páginas: 573-587 |
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión NBC Dios VA Filosofía |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Molinism
B Open Theism B Gregory Boyd B Open future B William Lane Craig |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
Sumario: | This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bivalence and a classical conception of omniscience. In what follows, I argue that it can. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-016-0558-5 |