The Open Future Square of Opposition: a Defense
This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bival...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
[2017]
|
In: |
Sophia
Jahr: 2017, Band: 56, Heft: 4, Seiten: 573-587 |
IxTheo Notationen: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre VA Philosophie |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Molinism
B Open Theism B Gregory Boyd B Open future B William Lane Craig |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Zusammenfassung: | This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bivalence and a classical conception of omniscience. In what follows, I argue that it can. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-016-0558-5 |