Reformation or Revolution? Herman Bavinck and Henri de Lubac on Nature and Grace
Henri de Lubac’s treatment of the relationship between nature and grace will be critiqued by Herman Bavinck’s ‘grace restores nature’ theme. In two significant addresses, Bavinck critiqued a Roman Catholic approach to nature and grace. De Lubac’s influence upon Roman Catholic thinking addressing nat...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2017
|
| Dans: |
Perichoresis
Année: 2017, Volume: 15, Numéro: 3, Pages: 81-95 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAH Époque moderne KAJ Époque contemporaine KDB Église catholique romaine KDD Église protestante NBD Création NBK Sotériologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Herman Bavinck
grace restores nature
Henri de Lubac
nature and grace
Neo-Calvinism
nouvelle théologie
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Maison d'édition) |
| Résumé: | Henri de Lubac’s treatment of the relationship between nature and grace will be critiqued by Herman Bavinck’s ‘grace restores nature’ theme. In two significant addresses, Bavinck critiqued a Roman Catholic approach to nature and grace. De Lubac’s influence upon Roman Catholic thinking addressing nature and grace occurred post-Bavinck and has altered Catholic thinking on the subject. Neo-Calvinist scholar, Wolter Huttinga admits that Bavinck and de Lubac offer similar critiques of Roman Catholicism (Huttinga 2014). The question remains then, do Bavinck’s critiques still hold? I propose that Bavinck’s account of grace restores nature still makes valid critiques of a post-Vatican II construction of nature and grace. The paper is broken into three sections: (1) an exploration of de Lubac’s nature and grace theme, (2) the framework of Bavinck’s ‘grace restores nature’ theme, and (3) a Bavinckian critique of de Lubac’s nature and grace theme. |
|---|---|
| Description matérielle: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 2284-7308 |
| Contient: | In: Perichoresis
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/perc-2017-0017 |