Reformation or Revolution? Herman Bavinck and Henri de Lubac on Nature and Grace
Henri de Lubac’s treatment of the relationship between nature and grace will be critiqued by Herman Bavinck’s ‘grace restores nature’ theme. In two significant addresses, Bavinck critiqued a Roman Catholic approach to nature and grace. De Lubac’s influence upon Roman Catholic thinking addressing nat...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2017
|
| In: |
Perichoresis
Year: 2017, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 81-95 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church KDD Protestant Church NBD Doctrine of Creation NBK Soteriology |
| Further subjects: | B
Herman Bavinck
grace restores nature
Henri de Lubac
nature and grace
Neo-Calvinism
nouvelle théologie
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | Henri de Lubac’s treatment of the relationship between nature and grace will be critiqued by Herman Bavinck’s ‘grace restores nature’ theme. In two significant addresses, Bavinck critiqued a Roman Catholic approach to nature and grace. De Lubac’s influence upon Roman Catholic thinking addressing nature and grace occurred post-Bavinck and has altered Catholic thinking on the subject. Neo-Calvinist scholar, Wolter Huttinga admits that Bavinck and de Lubac offer similar critiques of Roman Catholicism (Huttinga 2014). The question remains then, do Bavinck’s critiques still hold? I propose that Bavinck’s account of grace restores nature still makes valid critiques of a post-Vatican II construction of nature and grace. The paper is broken into three sections: (1) an exploration of de Lubac’s nature and grace theme, (2) the framework of Bavinck’s ‘grace restores nature’ theme, and (3) a Bavinckian critique of de Lubac’s nature and grace theme. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 2284-7308 |
| Contains: | In: Perichoresis
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/perc-2017-0017 |