The Voice of Conscience, Kierkegaard’s Theory of Indirect Communication, and Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue
This paper investigates the concept and the experience of conscience as an interface of aesthetic, ethical, and religious aspects of Kierkegaard’s existential approach, while criticizing his reductionist definition of ‘aesthetics’ and the opposition he draws between ethics and aesthetics. A comparis...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
De Gruyter
2017
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Year: 2017, 卷: 2017, 發布: 1, Pages: 363-378 |
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBE Anthropology NCA Ethics TJ Modern history TK Recent history |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| 總結: | This paper investigates the concept and the experience of conscience as an interface of aesthetic, ethical, and religious aspects of Kierkegaard’s existential approach, while criticizing his reductionist definition of ‘aesthetics’ and the opposition he draws between ethics and aesthetics. A comparison of Kierkegaard’s theory of indirect ‘existence’-communication with Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue shows that Kierkegaard overlooks three crucial moments of truly liberating, conscientious communication, including the dialogical dynamics of becoming-oneself vis-à-vis the Other. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
| Contains: | In: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2017-0015 |