On Propositional Platonism, Representation, and Divine Conceptualism
Gould and Davis (2014) have recently argued for the claim that Propositional Platonism is mistaken since it is not able to explain how a proposition comes to bear its representational properties. But, say Gould and Davis, if Propositional Platonism is mistaken, then Divine Conceptualism must be true...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2016]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 8, Issue: 4, Pages: 195-212 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Platonism
/ God
/ Conceptualism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567182259 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180614101555.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v8i4.1763 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567182259 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497182254 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497182254 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1077794924 |0 (DE-627)837511097 |0 (DE-576)44668130X |4 aut |a Ruloff, C. P. |d 1967- | |
| 109 | |a Ruloff, C. P. 1967- |a Ruloff, Colin P. 1967- |a Ruloff, Colin 1967- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On Propositional Platonism, Representation, and Divine Conceptualism |c C. P. Ruloff |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Gould and Davis (2014) have recently argued for the claim that Propositional Platonism is mistaken since it is not able to explain how a proposition comes to bear its representational properties. But, say Gould and Davis, if Propositional Platonism is mistaken, then Divine Conceptualism must be true and we should therefore identify propositions with the contents of a divine mind, i.e., God. In this paper, I argue that Gould and Davis argument against Propositional Platonism fails since it depends upon a number of assumptions that the Propositional Platonist need not accept. | ||
| 601 | |a Proposition | ||
| 652 | |a AB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4046303-5 |0 (DE-627)106198513 |0 (DE-576)209068914 |2 gnd |a Platonismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4165224-1 |0 (DE-627)105441694 |0 (DE-576)209893893 |2 gnd |a Konzeptualismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 8(2016), 4, Seite 195-212 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:195-212 |
| 856 | |u https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/download/1763/1448 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1763 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i4.1763 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 195-212 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2992875864 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567182259 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180601174321 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Conceptualism,God,God,Platonism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Conceptualisme,Dieu,Dieu,Platonisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Conceptualismo,Dios,Dios,Platonismo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Concettualismo,Dio,Dio,Platonismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 柏拉图主义,概念论,观念论,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 柏拉圖主義,概念論,觀念論,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Conceitualismo,Deus,Deus,Platonismo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Концептуализм,Платонизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Εννοιοκρατία,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Πλατωνισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Playing God , Konstruktiver Konzeptualismus |