Infinite Striving and the Infinite Subject: a Kierkegaardian reply to Schellenberg
In this paper I argue - pace J. L. Schellenberg - that it remains the case for Kierkegaard that infinite striving, properly understood, is essential to the relationship with God, who remains the Infinite Subject, one necessarily hidden for defensible logical, ontological, and existential reasons. Th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2016]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 8, Issue: 4, Pages: 143-156 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Kierkegaard, Søren 1813-1855
/ Schellenberg, J. L. 1959-
/ Human being
/ Relationship
/ God
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | In this paper I argue - pace J. L. Schellenberg - that it remains the case for Kierkegaard that infinite striving, properly understood, is essential to the relationship with God, who remains the Infinite Subject, one necessarily hidden for defensible logical, ontological, and existential reasons. Thus Kierkegaards arguments for the hiddenness of God as a logically required ingredient in the relationship that human beings are called to undertake with God can withstand Schellenbergs criticisms. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v8i4.1760 |