Discipline, Coercion, and Correction
In the lengthy Epistula 185 to Boniface, Augustine outlines the difference between Arians and Donatists. The letter quickly turns to the question of violence perpetrated by the followers of Donatus and Caecilianus. Augustine claims that the violence inflicted by the Donatists against the Caecilianis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2017, Volume: 13, Issue: 1, Pages: 114-130 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NAB Fundamental theology |
| Further subjects: | B
Augustine of Hippo
Donatism
religious violence
classical rhetoric
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | In the lengthy Epistula 185 to Boniface, Augustine outlines the difference between Arians and Donatists. The letter quickly turns to the question of violence perpetrated by the followers of Donatus and Caecilianus. Augustine claims that the violence inflicted by the Donatists against the Caecilianists or themselves was violence indeed, while that inflicted by the Caecilianists against the Donatists, which he could not deny was happening, was classified as discipline and correction. Further, Augustine was attempting to convince a state official that their enforcement of imperial legislation needed to be corrective, and therefore could not be shirked nor could be undertaken without the right intent. This paper examines the arguments and tactics Augustine uses to condemn the Donatists while at the same time justifying the Caecilianists.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
| Contains: | In: Scrinium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00131p10 |