The Place of Subjectivity in the Academic Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin
This paper responds to post-structuralist criticisms of my book, Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto, made by Craig Martin. In particular, it defends my realist accounts of human beliefs and of religions as structures that operate, respectively, in human subjectivity and in history, e...
| Published in: | Method & theory in the study of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Schilbrack, Kevin 1964-, Philosophy and the study of religions
/ Science of Religion
/ Critical realism
/ Subjectivity
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Further subjects: | B
Critical Realism
subjectivity
Kevin Schilbrack
manifesto
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | This paper responds to post-structuralist criticisms of my book, Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto, made by Craig Martin. In particular, it defends my realist accounts of human beliefs and of religions as structures that operate, respectively, in human subjectivity and in history, even when they are not named. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Reference: | Kommentar zu "“Yes, ... but ...”: The Neo-Perennialists (2017)"
Kommentar in "Rejoinder (2017)" |
| Contains: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341397 |