An unfortunate comparison of apples to oranges: comment on Jensma (2016)
In reporting the findings of her outcome study of Alongside's intensive outpatient psychotherapy (IOP) program for Christian missionari380413965380413965es and clergy, Jensma (2016) offered an unfortunate "apples-to-oranges" comparison to my outcome data on Link Care’s IOP, which resu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 233-236 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Psychotherapy
/ Research
/ Methodology
/ Duration
/ Simile
|
| IxTheo Classification: | ZD Psychology |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | In reporting the findings of her outcome study of Alongside's intensive outpatient psychotherapy (IOP) program for Christian missionari380413965380413965es and clergy, Jensma (2016) offered an unfortunate "apples-to-oranges" comparison to my outcome data on Link Care’s IOP, which resulted in a largely erroneous discussion section. In this comment, I briefly describe the nature of the problematic comparison and provide some additional analyses of my earlier outcome research to highlight my concerns. I close with the assertion that extant data can only support the conclusion that Alongside and Link Care IOP programs both appear to be beneficial to participants and equivalently so at three month follow up. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0091-6471 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Outcome study findings of an intensive outpatient program for missionaries and clergy (2016)"
Kritik in "Apples or oranges - does the fruit remain? (2017)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
|