The End of Eternity
A popular critique of the kalām cosmological argument is that one argument for its second premise (what I call the Impossible Formation Argument, IFA) illicitly assumes a finite starting point for the series of past temporal events, thereby begging the question against opponents. Rejecting this assu...
| Published in: | Sophia |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
[2017]
|
| In: |
Sophia
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBD Doctrine of Creation VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Infinity
B Cosmological Argument B Eternity B Kalām |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1565892763 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200629213918.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 171130s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11841-017-0590-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1565892763 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)495892769 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ495892769 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1069538051 |0 (DE-627)821983245 |0 (DE-576)34551159X |4 aut |a Watson, Jamie Carlin | |
| 109 | |a Watson, Jamie Carlin |a Watson, Jamie C. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The End of Eternity |c Jamie Carlin Watson |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A popular critique of the kalām cosmological argument is that one argument for its second premise (what I call the Impossible Formation Argument, IFA) illicitly assumes a finite starting point for the series of past temporal events, thereby begging the question against opponents. Rejecting this assumption, opponents say, eliminates any objections to the possibility that the past is infinitely old and undermines the IFAs ability to support premise 2. I contend that the plausibility of this objection depends on ambiguities in extant formulations of the IFA and that we may resolve these ambiguities in a way that does not presuppose a finite staring point. I also argue that this disambiguation allows us to construct an argument demonstrating that the concept of an infinite past entails a contradiction. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Cosmological Argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Eternity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infinity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kalām | |
| 652 | |a NBD:VB | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 56(2017), 2, Seite 147-162 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:147-162 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11841-017-0590-0 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0590-0 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 56 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 147-162 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2988501181 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1565892763 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200629214629 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 171130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051531 |a NBD | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||