Skeptical Theism Remains Refuted: a Reply to Perrine

In my 2013 article ‘A Refutation of Skeptical Theism,’ I argued that observing seemingly unjustified evils (SUEs) always reduces the probability of God’s existence. When figuring the relevant probabilities, I used a basic probability calculus that simply distributes the probability of falsified hypo...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Johnson, David Kyle (Author)
其他作者: Perrine, Timothy (Bibliographic antecedent)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Springer Netherlands [2017]
In: Sophia
Year: 2017, 卷: 56, 發布: 2, Pages: 367-371
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Atheism
B Bayes Theorem
B Skeptical theism
在線閱讀: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
實物特徵
總結:In my 2013 article ‘A Refutation of Skeptical Theism,’ I argued that observing seemingly unjustified evils (SUEs) always reduces the probability of God’s existence. When figuring the relevant probabilities, I used a basic probability calculus that simply distributes the probability of falsified hypotheses equally. In 2015, Timothy Perrine argued that, since Bayes Theorem doesn’t always equally distribute the probability of falsified hypotheses, my argument is undermined unless I can also show that my thesis follows on a Bayesian analysis. It is the purpose of this paper to meet that burden.
ISSN:1873-930X
Reference:Kritik von "A Note on Johnson’s ‘A Refutation of Skeptical Theism’ (2015)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Sophia
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11841-017-0599-4