Skeptical Theism Remains Refuted: a Reply to Perrine
In my 2013 article A Refutation of Skeptical Theism, I argued that observing seemingly unjustified evils (SUEs) always reduces the probability of Gods existence. When figuring the relevant probabilities, I used a basic probability calculus that simply distributes the probability of falsified hypo...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Springer Netherlands
[2017]
|
| В: |
Sophia
Год: 2017, Том: 56, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 367-371 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии NBC Бог VB Герменевтика ; Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Atheism
B Bayes Theorem B Skeptical theism |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | In my 2013 article A Refutation of Skeptical Theism, I argued that observing seemingly unjustified evils (SUEs) always reduces the probability of Gods existence. When figuring the relevant probabilities, I used a basic probability calculus that simply distributes the probability of falsified hypotheses equally. In 2015, Timothy Perrine argued that, since Bayes Theorem doesnt always equally distribute the probability of falsified hypotheses, my argument is undermined unless I can also show that my thesis follows on a Bayesian analysis. It is the purpose of this paper to meet that burden. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "A Note on Johnsons A Refutation of Skeptical Theism (2015)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-017-0599-4 |