Euthyphro and Moral Realism: A Reply to Harrison
Gerald Harrison identifies two Euthyphro-related concerns for divine command theories and makes the case that to the extent that these concerns make trouble for divine command theories they also make trouble for non-naturalistic moral realism and naturalistic moral realism (call this the parity thes...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Άλλοι συγγραφείς: | |
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
[2016]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Sophia
Έτος: 2016, Τόμος: 55, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 437-449 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | NBC Δόγμα του Θεού NCA Ηθική VA Φιλοσοφία |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Moral Realism
B Divine Command B Harrison B Euthyphro |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | Gerald Harrison identifies two Euthyphro-related concerns for divine command theories and makes the case that to the extent that these concerns make trouble for divine command theories they also make trouble for non-naturalistic moral realism and naturalistic moral realism (call this the parity thesis). He also offers responses to the two concerns on behalf of divine command theorists. I show here that the parity thesis does not hold for the most commonly discussed version of divine command theory. I further argue that his responses to the two concerns fail. Finally, I draw on some of Harrisons ideas to identify an advantage that non-naturalistic moral realism has over divine command theories and naturalistic moral realism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Αναφορά: | Kritik in "Divine Command Theory and Horrendous Deeds (2018)"
|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-016-0545-x |
