On Letting Go of Theodicy: Marilyn McCord Adams on God and Evil

Marilyn McCord Adams agrees with D. Z. Phillips that instrumental theodicy is a moral failure, and that sceptical theists and others are guilty of ignoring what we know now (in this life) about the moral reality of horrendous evils to speculate about unknown ways these evils might be made sense of....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sophia
Main Author: Gleeson, Andrew 1957- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands [2015]
In: Sophia
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Evil
B Compensation
B Theodicy
B God
B Horrors
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Marilyn McCord Adams agrees with D. Z. Phillips that instrumental theodicy is a moral failure, and that sceptical theists and others are guilty of ignoring what we know now (in this life) about the moral reality of horrendous evils to speculate about unknown ways these evils might be made sense of. In place of theodicy, Adams advocates ‘the logic of compensation’ for the victims of evil, a postmortem healing of divine intimacy with God. This goes so deep, she believes, that eventually victims will see the horrors they suffered as points of contact with the incarnate, suffering God and cease wishing they had never suffered them. I argue Adams’s position falls foul of the very criticisms she and Phillips make against instrumental theodicy.
ISSN:1873-930X
Contains:Enthalten in: Sophia
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11841-014-0431-3