On Letting Go of Theodicy: Marilyn McCord Adams on God and Evil
Marilyn McCord Adams agrees with D. Z. Phillips that instrumental theodicy is a moral failure, and that sceptical theists and others are guilty of ignoring what we know now (in this life) about the moral reality of horrendous evils to speculate about unknown ways these evils might be made sense of....
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
[2015]
|
| Em: |
Sophia
Ano: 2015, Volume: 54, Número: 1, Páginas: 1-12 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião KAJ Época contemporânea NBC Deus |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Evil
B Compensation B Theodicy B God B Horrors |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | Marilyn McCord Adams agrees with D. Z. Phillips that instrumental theodicy is a moral failure, and that sceptical theists and others are guilty of ignoring what we know now (in this life) about the moral reality of horrendous evils to speculate about unknown ways these evils might be made sense of. In place of theodicy, Adams advocates the logic of compensation for the victims of evil, a postmortem healing of divine intimacy with God. This goes so deep, she believes, that eventually victims will see the horrors they suffered as points of contact with the incarnate, suffering God and cease wishing they had never suffered them. I argue Adamss position falls foul of the very criticisms she and Phillips make against instrumental theodicy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-014-0431-3 |
